还有不到一个月四六级考试就要开始了呐，不知道大家都准备的怎么样了呢?下面是yjbys网小编提供给大家关于英语四级阅读理解长篇阅读匹配习题，希望对大家的备考有所帮助。
The Heart Assoeiation’s Junk Science Diet
A.A recent Cambridge University anal ysis of 76 studies involving more than 650，000 people concluded,“The current evidence does not clearly support guidelines that low consumption of total Saturated fats.“Yet the American Heart Association(AriA.，in its most recent dietary guidelines，held fast to the idea that we must A.l eat diets for optimal heart ’s a stance that—at the very best—is controversiA.，and at worst is dead a practicing cardiologist(心脏病学家)for more than three decades，I agree with the latte—it’s dead does the AHA cling to recommendations that fly in the face of scientific evidence?
I discovered was both ing and AHA not only ignored A.l the other risk factors for heart disease，but it appointed someone with ties to Big Food and bizarre scientific beliefs to lead the guideline-writing paneHust the type of thing’that undermines the public’s confidence in the medical AHA guidelines warrant that saturated fat make up no more than 5 to 6 percent of daily cal ories for adults because this will lower“bad”cholesterol(胆固醇)，for those people who need blood pressure control，the guidelines suggest lowering sodium(salt)intake to no more than a teaspoon(2，300 mg)ite many other known risk factors for heart disease，salt and fat were，astonishingly,the only two considered by the AHA panel writing the e are many other recognized risk factors the AHA ignored，including blood sugar level，low“good”cholesterol，insulin(胰岛素)levels，and body weight—an of these are influenced by diet.
fact，most people who have heart attacks don’t have elevations in bad are much more likely to have metabolic syndrome(新陈代谢综合征)—a condition that puts you at high risk for diabetes and heart restingly enough，blood triglycerides(甘油三脂)do not go up with eating fat—they go up if you eat a diet high in processed grains，starches，and rtunately for the proponents of high-carbohydrate(糖类)diets，high blood triglycerides are a major risk factor for heart fat/high carb diets lower protective“good”cholesterol and raise insulin.
These diets are involved in the development of h is a powerful risk factor for developing heart disease.
Heart Cheek Program’s contribution
writers of the 20 13 statin guidelines based their recommendations on studies that looked at the reduction in the risk of events like heart attacks in people treated with ared to people on a placebo(安慰剂) AHA dietary guidelines do not cite any diet studies that looked at whether following a specific diet lowered the risk of developing heart events—yet they are giving dietary might be two plausible is the AHA's moneymaking“Heart Check Program.”The second is the conflict of interest of Robert Ecke—the co-chair of the panel that wrote the guidelines.
percent of these“heart ”foods—over 400 of them—are meat：92 are processed meats—which have been shown to have either neutrA. or negative effects on heart more problematic are the foods containing added AHA recommends that women consume less
than 6 teaspoons(1 00 calories)of sugar a day and less than 9 teaspoons(1 50 caories)for there are items that get the nod of approvA. from the Heart Check program despite being near or at the sugar limit.1ike Bruce’s Yams Candied Sweet Potatoes and Choice ry Steak.
F. Until this year,Heart Check approved many foods with trans-fats，which raise bad cholesterol and lower good cholesterol，among other harmful effects on ，like increasing inflammation(发炎)and the laying down of calcium in arteries(动脉).
the dietary guidelines，the AHA Heart Check Program appears to address only the effect of foods on cholesterollevel and blood while，since the 1 970s，our yearly sugar consumption has increased quickly with the incidence of diabetes and brings us to rt
l，the co-chair of the Working is a consultant for h specializes“in food，beverage，nutrition，health and wellness.”Foodminds works with more than 30 leading food，beverage，and nutrition to offer a“one stop shop of…consulting…to guide food and beverage companies in navigating the complexities around the upcoming FDA Nutrition Facts label overhaul.”In other minds is a lobbying firm for“Big Food.”
Creationist’s coming
H. And then there is this：l describes himself as“a scientist and professing creationist and a member of the technicA. advisory board of the Institute for Creation Research…”Many scientists are religious.111is is not to question l’s religious to question his ability to think believes there is scientific proof that the world was created in six days and mat evolution does not should at least raise eyebrows when the co-chair of an influential panel charged with giving sound dietary advice has a financiA. conflict of interest and proselytizes for beliefs that are ntific.
American people should be able to trust that only impartiA. scientists write should be confident that those experts are not working to advance corporate interests and that they do not espouse beliefs that are well outside the scientific avowed creationist who consults for a food lobby hardly seems an appropriate choice to fulfill these the last several decades，the AHA has promoted a ohydrate diet as a cornerstone of heart has taken a very public position that saturated fats are a major driver of heart disease risk and the mounting tide of evidence that this is dead wrong must put it in a very uncomfortable yet a fundamental requirement of science--as opposed to propaganda--is that when evidence that contradicts a hypothesis is replicated over and over again，that hypothesis must be abandoned.
J. The idea that eating high amounts of saturated fat causes hardening of the arteries—the ed“diet-heart hypothesis—deserves to be iettisoned along with other discredited belief tionism comes to the AHA step up to the plate?
is ftm that blood triglyeerides won’t rise when you eat fat,but go up with eating other sugar and starches.
processed meats are proved to be harmful more or less to our heart health.
other known risk factors for heart disease have been overlooked by the AHA pt for salt and fat.
does not aim to query the religious faith of l，but his capability to ponder scientifically.
idea held by AHA that we must A.l eat diets for optimA. heart is a controversiA. stance，while at worst，it is dead wrong.
foods approved by Heart Check would be harmful to our body health.
52.A hypothesis must be iettisoned when it clashes with the convincing evidence.
e the annually sugar accommodation has rocketed with the occurrence of diabetes and obesity.
view that high intake of saturated fat could result in sclerosis of artery should be discarded with other untrustful beliefs.
AHA dietary guidelines do not quote any diet researches that can tell us whether a specific diet can decrease the risk of heart disease.
is fun that blood triglycerides won’t rise when you eat go up with eating other sugar and starches.有趣的是，当你食用脂肪时血甘油三酯不会升高，而食用一些糖类或淀粉时就会升高。
rocessedmeatsareprovedto beharmfulmore orlessto ourhearthealth.经预处理的肉多多少少会对我们的心脏健康有负作用。
other known risk factors for heart disease have been overlooked by the AHA panel，except for salt and fat.很多其他影响心脏健康的危险因素被AHA饮食指南制定小组忽略了，但盐分和脂肪除外。
does not aim to query the religious faith of his capability to ponder scientifically.这并不是在质疑埃克尔博士的宗教信仰，而是他进行科学化思考的能力。
idea held by AHA that we must all eat low-fat diets for optimal heart is a controversial stance，while at Worst，it is dead wrong.从最好的一面来看，AHA坚持我们必须采用低脂肪饮食以达到最佳的心脏健康状态的观点是有争议的'，然而最坏的就是，它是大错特错的。
foods approved by Heart Check would be harmful to our body health.心脏检查程序认证通过的许多食物对我们的身体是有害的。
52.A hypothesis must be jettisoned when it clashes with the convincing evidence.当一个假设与令人信服的证据冲突时，它应该果断被摒弃。
e the 1970s，Our annually sugar accommodation has rocketed along with the occurrence of diabetes and obesity.自20世纪70年代以来，糖的年供应量随着糖尿病和肥胖症的高发迅速增加。
view that high intake of saturated fat could result in sclerosis of artery should be discarded with other untrustful beliefs.摄入高含量的饱和脂肪会导致动脉硬化的观点应该和其他不可信的观念一同被抛弃。
AHA dietary guidelines do not quote any diet researches that Can tell uswhether a specific diet Can decrease the risk ofheart 的饮食指南并没有引用任何饮食研究，这些研究也并未指出特定的饮食是否可以降低患心脏病的风险。
学识谷
